RSS Featured

Note to Self: Be Sure to Attend the Power Lunch Again Next Year!

By Rosemary Heilemann

powerlunch 1

On Monday, May 18, the International Ballroom at the Chicago Hilton was packed from corner to corner at Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky’s 14th Annual Ultimate Women’s Power Lunch.  Even more than the numbers, the enthusiasm and energy of more than 2,000 strong women and the men who admire them, including dozens of Tenth Dems, threatened to burst the very walls.

Co-hosts Josina Morita, former candidate for the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, and Hon. Stephanie D. Neely, former treasurer of the City of Chicago, welcomed the crowd warmly and read a moving letter of encouragement from Hillary Clinton.  Then, after acknowledging candidates and elected officials, our host delivered her prepared remarks.

Rep. Schakowsky talked about growing up in Rogers Park.  She described a time when ordinary working people could live comfortably, without worrying about putting food on the table, reasonably expecting that their children would live a better life than theirs.  She contrasted that time with ours, a time when, in the words of AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, “most families come home to a full plate of worry.”  Yet, Rep. Schakowsky said, the United States has never been wealthier.  Since 1980, GDP has grown by 77 percent and worker productivity has increased by 75 percent.

The bad news?  Despite our national prosperity, 80 percent of workers have seen no improvement in their standard of living.  The excess money from all this productivity has mostly gone to the top one percent of earners.  At the same time, this year’s federal budget has cut 40 percent from health and welfare programs, including SNAP (food stamps), that will hurt one million people.  These policies are bad for the people and bad for the economy.  When working people get paid, they spend most of their income, which stimulates the economy.  It is estimated that the $1.3 trillion in excess earnings of the highest paid individuals would create 10 million jobs if that money were actually spent.

But Rep. Schakowsky followed this dismal picture with good news.  Federal tax laws and changes in government regulations over many years have created our lopsided economy, and loopholes and policies that created economic inequality can be undone.  The Democratic Women’s Congressional Caucus, adopting the theme “When Women Succeed, America Succeeds,” is writing bills to address economic inequality, bills calling for increases in social security benefits; government-supported child care, pre-school, and elder care; support for women entrepreneurs; and reduction of college debt.

There is a renewed progressive mood in the country, Schakowsky said.  Studies have shown that progressive ideas such as closing corporate loopholes, increasing capital gains taxes, increasing the minimum wage, providing true pensions, reforming immigration, and imposing higher taxes on millionaires and billionaires are popular.  Women are tending to vote Democratic because they are looking for candidates who understand their issues.

Elections really matter, and the key is to engage the electorate.  Only one-third of eligible voters turned out for the 2014 election.  “We are smart enough, strong enough, and determined enough to make changes in 2016,” Schakowsky said.

Rep. Schakowsky yielded the floor to Saru Jayaraman, co-founder of ROC United, a group fighting for improved conditions for restaurant workers.  Ms. Jayaraman told us that one-twelfth of American workers are restaurant workers, the lowest paid of all occupations.  Because of exceptions successfully lobbied for by the restaurant industry, the minimum wage for such tipped workers is well below that legislated for other workers—$2.13 per hour under federal law and $4.95 in Illinois.  In her allotted five minutes, this dynamic young woman made the case for eliminating this discrepancy, explaining that by designating workers as “tipped,” restaurant owners relieve themselves of the obligation to pay a living wage.

In the wake of these dynamic introductory speakers, keynote speaker Sister Simone Campbell came to the podium.  Well-known since 2012 for her “Nuns on the Bus” national tour, Sister Simone spoke calmly and softly, with the confidence of one who has been a registered lobbyist, speaker, educator, and activist since 1978.  Her message was that every one of us can accomplish something if we engage with others.  Change, she said, requires that we build relationships, learn people’s stories, and then tell those stories—in short, open our hearts and then “gossip.”   People are hungering to belong to something, which is why they sometimes get attached to leaders who do not serve their best interests.  Sister Simone encouraged us to build a sense of community with people we encounter, to ask questions about their lives, and to learn and share their stories.

Sister Simone’s remarks invoked a palpable sense of community in the ballroom, and her quiet confidence inspired optimism.  Such group experiences strengthen our determination to continue to work for the changes that will benefit our country and its people.  This was my first Ultimate Women’s Power Lunch, and it surely will not be my last.

powerlunch2

Why Our Restrictive Immigration Policy is Just Plain Wrong

immigration

by Barbara Altman

My strong opposition to the American policy that radically limits immigration has always been based on a combination of historical fact and my view of right and wrong.  After all, unless we’re full-blooded members of an indigenous tribe, every one of us can trace our ancestry to a land outside the borders of the United States. With the exception of those whose ancestors came here involuntarily as part of the slave trade, we can all find someone in our family tree who came to America looking for a better life.  Given these historical facts, who are we to tell the current crop of foreigners looking for a better life that they can’t come to “our country”?  It may strike you as naïve, but I long for us to live by the words inscribed on the Statue of Liberty and “lift the lamp beside the golden door.”

Generally, when I try to support these views with policy arguments, I can come up with only anecdotal evidence.  Look at all the immigrants who contributed to the ascendancy of this nation in the 20th century, I say – Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi. Madeleine Albright, I.M. Pei, George Balanchine – the list is endless. And why, I’ve always asked, do we bring foreign students to the United States to study at our colleges and universities, only to make it impossible for them to remain in this country and apply that education to improving our nation?  Finally, I reason that, excepting those with nefarious intent, immigrants tend to be the cream of the society they’ve fled.  That is, it’s the very people who have the courage and the grit to risk everything to leave the familiar and travel to a foreign land where they may not even understand the language who have the most to offer their adopted country.

So imagine my delight to read the economic argument that supports my open-border bias in The New York Times Magazine for March 29.

According to economist Adam Davidson, writing in his weekly “On Money” column, those who oppose open borders in the belief that immigrants take jobs that otherwise would go to workers already in the United States have got it not just wrong, but actually backwards.  Jobs, Davidson explains, are not a “lump,” and employment is not a zero sum game.  Every new worker in the United States, just by being employed, stimulates the creation of additional jobs—jobs for the people who rent her an apartment, who check him out at the grocery store, who sell her a car and gas to run it, who teach his children…well, you get the idea.  Davidson says that it’s a fact that population growth stimulates economic growth and that, therefore, whether the population grows because birthrates increase or because of immigration, the result is essentially the same. Certainly, it stands to reason that if one of those foreign students we allow to remain in the United States starts the next technically innovative business, she will create innumerable new jobs for those of us already residing in this country.

Also, according to Davidson, an influx of workers at the low end of the wage scale makes the economy work more efficiently.  He gives examples using the construction industry, arguing that everyone is better off if the skilled craftsmen on the job aren’t also the workers hauling and sweeping.  Haulers and sweepers can be paid less per hour than skilled workers, and employing them will free up the higher-earning skilled workers to focus on the tasks that demand their skills.

So my wish is that we stop expending political energy on thinking of ways to stop immigration and start focusing on the best way to open up our country to immigrants—while weeding out criminals and anyone else intending us harm, of course.  It turns out that not only would such a policy constitute a return to fundamental American ideals, but it would also be good economics.

Congress Watch: Dold and Kirk Vote To Gut Medicare and Other Health and Social Programs, Increase Defense Spending, and Lower Taxes on the Wealthiest Americans

by Ronald Altman

Congress went home for another two-week vacation after the House passed a budget on a 228-199 party-line vote. If enacted, the House budget would gut the past 80 years of social legislation. The Senate passed the same budget with a 52-46 mostly party-line vote (Senators Cruz and Paul didn’t think it went far enough).

This reactionary budget did not receive a “yes” vote from a single Democrat in either house of Congress. Both Illinois Senator Mark Kirk and 10th District Congressman Bob Dold voted “yes.”

kirk dold
Since the 2010 midterm election results returned the Republicans to power and made John Boehner Speaker, deficit hawks led by Representative Paul Ryan have longed to take a hatchet to Democratic priorities. Until this year, Senator Harry Reid and a Democratic majority in the Senate had stood in the way of their plans. In fact, Congress has been so dysfunctional during the Obama administration that no budget bill has passed both houses since 2008.

But now the Republicans have their majority in both houses of Congress. Although the final Authorization and Appropriation Acts that will outline the severity of the damage remain to be passed, we can be sure that if this budget were enacted ours would become a radically different country.
Here are just some of the Republican budget priorities:

Conversion of Medicare from an Entitlement to a Refundable Tax Credit. Since passage in 1964, the Medicare Act has provided health insurance to Americans 65 years of age and older. This would change under the Budget Act of 2015. Those under age 56 in 2015 would not ever receive traditional Medicare benefits. Instead, they would receive a fixed refundable tax credit that they could use toward paying for health insurance purchased on the open market.

Dold and Kirk’s votes for this budget were votes to destroy Medicare.

Conversion of Medicaid to a Block Grant. Medicaid is a federal-state cooperative program with federal oversight and controls that pays for healthcare for needy aged, blind, and disabled people, as well as pregnant women and children. The 2015 budget bill would convert Medicaid to a federal block grant. A block grant is basically a fixed sum of money that the federal treasury doles out, with little or no oversight. The grantee state then uses the funds to pay for a portion of the costs of a series of programs, at the state’s discretion. Any remaining costs are the responsibility of the state, if it wishes to fund them.

Dold and Kirk’s votes for this budget were votes to deny healthcare to the poor, especially pregnant women and children.

Repeal of the Affordable Care Act. The budget bill fulfills the Republican dream of repealing Obamacare. It does not include any alternative for the more than 16 million Americans who have obtained health insurance through the Marketplace since 2014; it only instructs committees to find an alternative.

Without the Affordable Care Act, the more than 16 million enrollees would be thrown into the private health insurance marketplace without any of the current protections of Obamacare, or the subsidies that have made healthcare affordable to families earning less than four times poverty.

This would mark a return to the bad old days when Americans with any preexisting healthcare problem could not afford insurance, policies were subject to annual and lifetime payment limits, and policies often didn’t cover the full range of healthcare services.

Dold and Kirk’s votes for this budget were votes to deny more than 16 million Americans access to affordable healthcare.

Increased Defense Spending and Cuts to Social Spending. Over the past two years, the budget sequester that ended the 2013 government shutdown has reduced domestic and military spending equally and reduced the budget deficit from $1.33 trillion to $486 billion. The Republicans’ 2015 Budget Act raises defense spending to levels not seen since 2009. It then provides that spending for wars will be considered “emergency” off-budget spending, uncontrolled by the limitations of the sequester. At the same time, it cuts $2 trillion over the next 10 years from programs such as CHIP (children’s health insurance), food stamps, welfare, public transportation, and agricultural support

Dold and Kirk’s votes for this budget were votes to give priority to funding foreign wars over taking care of domestic needs.

Reduction of Tax Revenue. The 2015 Budget Act eliminates taxation of capital gains and dividends and lowers the maximum individual income tax rate to 35 percent. It also lowers the corporate tax rate to 25 percent and applies that lower rate to both normal C-corporations and so-called pass-through S-corporations. This means that self-employed individuals could lower their tax rate by 10 percent simply by forming a personal service or limited liability corporation.

Dold and Kirk’s votes for this budget were votes to reduce the taxes of the wealthiest Americans while offering no relief to wage earners.

A party’s budget proposals reflect the party’s priorities, and the Republicans’ 2015 Budget Act is no exception.  None of these priorities should be surprising; they all have been features of the Ryan budget for more than five years now.  What’s changed is that Ryan’s party now controls Congress.

Equally, the votes cast by congressmen and senators reflect the officeholders’ priorities.  By their support for this regressive, reactionary budget, Bob Dold and Mark Kirk have demonstrated that their priorities are not the priorities of voters in the 10th Congressional District, nor, we hope, of a majority of Illinois voters.

Both stand for reelection in 2016.  They must be defeated.

Monthly Newsletter: Packed with Pictures!

May cover newsletter

Tenth Dems May 2015 Newsletter

Please follow the link to view our May newsletter as a pdf file:

Tenth Dems newsletter May 2015

In this issue of Tenth News:

Hope Inspires High School Authors in Community Connection Writing Competition
by Carol Hillsberg
The night of April 14th was memorable for all who attended the Fifth Annual Community Connection Writing Competition, and Tenth News covered it all.

Two Iconic Illinois Democrats…
by Mark Rosenberg, M.D.
The latest Tenth Dems University session celebrated two giants of Illinois Democratic politics.

Congress Watch: Dold and Kirk Vote to Gut Medicare and Other Health and Social Programs, Increase Defense Spending, and Lower Taxes on the Wealthiest Americans
by Ronald Altman
Congress just recently completed the process of passing a budget, and both Bob Dold in the House and Mark Kirk in the Senate made sure their “Ayes” were counted toward this reactionary piece of legislation. How reactionary, you may ask? Let us tell you. Welcome to this month’s Congress Watch.

Why Our Restrictive Immigration Policy is Just Plain Wrong
by Barbara Altman
Immigration policy in America has gone completely off the rails, as the author of this story will passionately explain.

Ted Cruz Believes He’s the New Galileo
by Steven Gan
The race for the White House is heating up already, and the Republicans are contributing more than their share of hot air, and overheated candidates, to the mix, including Texas Senator Ted Cruz.

An Evening with Alan Grayson
by Adrienne Kirshbaum
The evening of April 8th, Pinstripes in Northbrook was rocking to the wit and wisdom of Rep. Alan Grayson.

State Senator Daniel Biss, a Pragmatic Advocate for Democratic Values
What is the Health Care Right of Conscience Act? It’s a piece of legislation in need of serious repair—so says Illinois State Senator Daniel Biss.

Paul Ryan praises “strong conservative” Bob Dold

Take it from Paul Ryan: Bob Dold is a “strong conservative.”

Rep. Paul Ryan added Rep. Bob Dold of Kenilworth to a list of his favorite GOP candidates running in 2016. Dold, who voted for the controversial Ryan budget, has a track record of voting with Republican leaders on key issues.Dold_Bob

Who are Ryan’s other picks?

— Climate science denier Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa)
— Koch Bros.-backed Gov. Scott Walker (R-Wisconsin)
— “Life Begins at Conception Act” co-sponsor Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colorado)

A section of the website adds that Dold “shares Chairman Ryan’s vision.”

It’s no surprise to those who know him best — Dold voted for the infamous Ryan budget, which included major benefit cuts, and would end Medicare as we know it.

Full list on Paul Ryan’s Prosperity PAC site: HERE.