RSS Newsletter Articles

Let’s Talk Politics: Michael Golden Tells How to Unlock Congress

TDU Unlock 4 TDU Unlock 3 TDU Unlock 2

by Carol Hillsberg

According to Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law Professor and author, Unlock Congress by Michael Golden “offers the most powerful and concise account of the deep failure that is Congress today.”  The book also offers solutions.  In Professor Lessig’s words, it “gives hope.”

Golden spoke about his ideas on Thursday evening, June 11, at the latest installment of “Let’s Talk Politics,” a series hosted by Tenth Dems University.

Sharon Sanders, Tenth Dems University’s dean, introduced Golden to a crowd of more than 50 at the RAM Restaurant and Brewery in Wheeling.  He began his presentation by stating that there are good people in politics and that the system is the problem.  He then thanked Tenth Dems for promoting many of the ideas he advocates and for providing a forum for political conversations.

Golden’s goal in his book and his talks is to educate and inform about dysfunction in government and to propose effective remedies for this problem.  At the center of Unlock Congress are what he identifies as structural defects that individually and in combination lead to negative effects on Congress’ performance.  As Carol Marin wrote of Golden in the Chicago Sun-Times, “Unlock Congress is about making bipartisan politics operational once again…His book is readable, and needs to be read.  It offers a vial of vaccine for the diseased politics that is crippling us.”

Among the defects Golden perceives are a flood of money into elections, rigged Congressional races, and two-year House terms.  He said that such structural defects in our system drive counterproductive outcomes, deter negotiation and compromise, and distort fair representation.  For example, due to Supreme Court decisions such as Citizens United, the money flood has produced an oligarchy in which the wealthiest 10 percent of the population have 15 times more influence on policies than the other 90 percent. Golden opined that two-year terms have led to a state of constant campaigning and fundraising, to the detriment of governing.  Primary elections that lead to winner-take-all general elections, along with gerrymandering, have increased polarization, Golden said.  He pointed out that in the last two decades the number of “moderates” who cross party lines in the House of Representatives has dropped from 113 to 26.  And even though Democrats received a clear majority of House votes nationwide in the last two cycles, the larger number of Republican-drawn districts has given Republicans the majority of seats in the House.

Golden has recommended remedies for the ills he perceives.  Among other things, he advocates extending U.S. House terms from two to four years, coinciding with presidential elections; unrigging Congressional races by instituting a system of proportional representation in which voters can vote for more than their first choice; and establishing campaign finance rules to counteract money’s influence on Congress.  Regarding gerrymandered congressional districts, the evening made clear that any effective remedy would have to be federal; otherwise, progressive states that reformed their redistricting processes would only be ceding more undemocratic power to the less-progressive states that continued to gerrymander.

Following a brief question-and-answer session, Golden remained at the RAM Restaurant to continue the conversation informally while signing copies of his book.

CONGRESS WATCH: Kirk and Dold Endorse Latest Republican Efforts to Undo Obamacare

Untitled-2

By Laurence D. Schiller

The last Congress Watch column reviewed the GOP budget passed on a party-line vote a month ago and pointed out how 10th District Congressman Bob Dold and Illinois Senator Mark Kirk have conveniently passed over the draconian cuts made to social programs while telling their constituents that they did no such thing. (“Congress Watch:  Dold and Kirk Vote To Gut Medicare and Other Health and Social Programs, Increase Defense Spending, and Lower Taxes on the Wealthiest Americans,” Tenth News, May 2015.)

In a May 18th newsletter to constituents, Kirk defended his vote by stressing the cold black-and-white numbers of the budget rather than the pain it was going to cause. Apparently to Mark Kirk, balancing the budget on the backs of the middle class and working poor is just fine, as long as military spending isn’t cut. Paul Ryan couldn’t have stated it better.

Kirk also wrote of the budget: “It stands as a referendum against President Obama’s budget by laying out a plan to repeal and replace Obamacare.”

Kirk’s glossary is as wrong as his facts.  A referendum is a direct vote by the electorate on a single political question.  That’s pretty much the opposite of a party-line budget vote in Congress.  The closest thing we’ve had to a referendum on Obamacare was the 2012 presidential election, which Obama won by millions of votes.  And polls show that if there were a national referendum on Obamacare today, approval of the Affordable Care Act would be overwhelming.

And note how Kirk repeats the tired line that the GOP has a plan to replace the ACA.  Yet no one, not Kirk, nor any one of the now nearly dozen declared Republican presidential candidates, has presented any alternative plan.  Certainly there’s nothing of the sort in the Republican budget Kirk supports.  Nor is any proposal to replace Obamacare on the agenda of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Like Kirk, Congressman Bob Dold, who already has voted to repeal the ACA some 30 times, refuses to quit his assault on this law. Most recently, Dold voted for HR 30, perversely called the “Save American Workers Act.”  It’s an anti-worker piece of legislation that increases the number of hours that employees must work to be covered by employer group health plans from 30 to 40 per week.

Like most in the Republican Party, Mark Kirk and Bob Dold do not believe that Americans have a right to affordable health insurance or affordable healthcare. And in the wake of the Supreme Court’s June 25 decision rejecting the most recent challenge to the ACA, neither Mark Kirk nor Bob Dold has even suggested that he intends to abandon efforts to repeal or gut the law. Don’t we in the 10th District have a right to better representation in Congress?

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MEDICARE

By MARK ROSENBERG M.D.

During the long debate about healthcare in 2009, a constituent famously told a U.S. Senator, “Keep your government hands off my Medicare!”  This exposed a misconception among those Americans who don’t think any government program can be any good.  Since they love Medicare, such Americans reason that the Federal government must not be in charge.  But they’re wrong.  The Medicare program is administered and funded by the U.S. government.

Medicare is 50 years old this month.  It’s appropriate to celebrate by taking a look at just what the Medicare program has become and what it has accomplished.  Despite the criticisms by many, including members of my own profession, and despite repeated attempts by Republicans to gut the program, Medicare has achieved its intended goals.  Medicare ensures access to healthcare for the program’s elderly and disabled beneficiaries and protects them from financial hardship.

To understand the importance of Medicare, it is important to return to 1965, when the program was enacted.  At that time, half of American seniors over the age of 65 were without health insurance; many were underinsured; and seniors paid over half of healthcare expenses directly out of pocket.  The result was that over 20 percent of seniors lived below the Federal poverty line.

Today Medicare covers 55 million Americans, representing 17 percent of the population, and it is expected that by 2030 80 million Americans will be covered by Medicare. Yet that success has been accompanied by a cost that continues to increase as both the numbers of seniors and the complexity of their illnesses rise.

One point of legitimate controversy is the administrative costs of Medicare.  While the actuarial cost is approximately three percent, compared with upwards of 20 percent in many private insurance plans, there are questions whether spending more on Medicare might actually save the program money in the end.  For example, additional upfront expenditures could address more effectively some of the concerns related to Medicare fraud, which is costly to the program.  And paying for more effective disease management programs would mitigate end-of-life expenditures.  With increasing burdens of chronic illness among the Medicare population, cost of end-of-life care is certain to be one of the big issues as Medicare enters its next 50 years.

One more thing.  Since the passage of Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act, or ACA), the law’s opponents, i.e., Republicans, have claimed that Obamacare threatens the viability of Medicare.  The claim is, to put it bluntly, false.  In fact, the ACA specifically prohibits cuts to guaranteed Medicare benefits.

Here are some of the specific facts:

First, Medicare is not part of the Federal Marketplace and is not purchased on the individual state health insurance markets.  Just as it was before Obamacare, enrollment in Part A (hospital and post-hospital benefits) does not require payment of any premiums.

Second, Medicare coverage has improved since enactment of the Affordable Care Act.  Medicare now covers most recommended screening, including colonoscopies and mammograms.  In addition, one wellness visit per year is included without charge, although not a physician visit.

Third, the Affordable Care Act increased prescription drug benefits under Medicare and provides that the “donut hole” that led to high mid-year drug costs for many seniors will be eliminated by 2020.

And fourth, for those physicians and clinics that participate, Obamacare makes improvements in care coordination.  This feature is especially important to seniors with chronic conditions.

Another important benefit of the ACA is that taxation of certain very high premium health plans, with the revenue earmarked to Medicare, will allow Medicare to remain financially solvent until at least 2029.

Happy 50th Birthday, Medicare.

THE WAGES OF SIN: VOLUNTEER OF THE MONTH CHARLES TROY

Charles Troy 1

By Eleonora di Liscia

Charles Troy is paying for his sins—by volunteering at Tenth Dems!  Since 2013, Charles has served as a graphic designer for the newsletter.

In 1992, Charles had his own graphic design/copywriting business.  An Evanston client asked Charles if he would mind doing work for a political candidate: a Republican running against Congressman Sid Yates, who was then 88 years old.

“I read this guy’s positions, and I thought, ‘That sounds all right.’  I could make a case for a younger guy against a guy who is past his prime.  I believe in a two-party system. The guy then lost to Yates 60-40.  Yates got the message to step down in 1994, and Jan Schakowsky ran and that was that,” Charles explained.

“Then I forgot about it until 2010 when we were living in Mundelein and represented by Melissa Bean, who I liked a lot.  There was a Republican primary, and I was horrified to see one of them was the guy I had done work for in 1992. It was Joe Walsh.  I saw what his positions were now, and I thought, ‘How sad. Eighteen years ago I did work for this guy, and now I wouldn’t want to shake his hand.’  And he won.  I was in agony for two years being represented by this jerk.”

In 2012, Mundelein was redistricted into the 10th.  “Then Brad Schneider won in my new district, and I was so appreciative and grateful that as expiation for my doing work for this awful Joe Walsh 20 years ago, I offered my services to Tenth Dems to do the newsletter,” Charles said.

But volunteering for Tenth Dems isn’t all penance.  Charles appreciates the chance to give back “by using the skills I have developed, in support of the local outpost of the national political party that I strongly support.”

Born in Chicago, Charles was raised in Skokie, graduating from Evanston High. “My parents were Stevenson Democrats, and I remember being very excited about the election of 1952 when I was 6 years old.  That conditioned me to Democrats losing,” he said.

Charles attended the University of Michigan, earning a B.A. in English. He had hoped to become a musical theater lyricist but, because of Vietnam, Charles went on to obtain a Master’s in English from New York University.

Returning to Chicago in 1969, Charles eventually worked for Foote, Cone and Belding, one of the largest advertising agencies. But the job was nothing like Mad Men.  “I was on the least glorious account. I was on International Harvester.  I wrote about farm implements. It was talking about manure spreaders and combines,” he said.

In 1972, Charles joined the family textile distribution business, but he was never happy.  After his mother died in 1990, he decided “there was no one left to please except myself,” so he hung his own shingle as a graphic designer and copywriter in desktop publishing.  “I was basically a creative fish out of water, badly cast as a businessman,” he said.

Charles worked out of his Highland Park home from 1990 until 2003, when he got an account laying out the catalog for OASIS, a senior learning center in Northbrook.

“I saw they had a number of classes in musical theater, and I thought, ‘Oh, this is something I should be doing,’” he said.

Charles let his accounts “wither away by attrition. What I’m doing now is something different and very exciting.”  He creates and shows multimedia presentations on musical theater topics.

“I do the stories behind the show or the stories behind the songwriters who wrote the great musicals.  I do the research, I do the graphic design, and I put them together in a program called Keynote with audio tracks and film clips.  That’s what I do mostly these days,” he said.

Charles presents monthly at the Skokie Theater.  His most recent production is “The Creation of  A Little Night Music,” the show by Steven Sondheim. He also appears at an annual Cole Porter festival and has done presentations on Christmas songs from the Great American Songbook and a recent collaboration with the Maxwell Street Klezmer Band on the history of Yiddish theater, which included a live band.

Essentially a lifelong Democrat, Charles remembers “when you could legitimately think of voting for the man but not the party.  And I don’t think that has been possible for 20 years.  I think anyone who calls themselves an independent now is fooling themselves,” he said.  “I never had a time where I was flirting with the basic precepts of Republicanism, although there are certain things like welfare in the extreme, people not relying on themselves, that’s where it gets sticky for me.”

Charles sees government as having a role in balancing “off the baser impulses of human nature. That to me is the core of what the Democratic Party stands for.  We simply cannot tell government to stay out of everything.  It doesn’t work.”

Tenth Dems Officially Opens Grayslake Office; Treasurer Mike Frerichs Keynotes

Grayslake 1 Grayslake 2

By Laurence Schiller

It seemed appropriate that on the 71st anniversary of the Allied invasion of Normandy Tenth Dems opened its third office in the 10th Congressional District.  At the dedication in Grayslake on June 6, speakers reminded a packed house that the ideals that the New Deal generation fought for in World War II are imperiled by a new generation of robber barons, headed in Illinois by Governor Bruce Rauner. The main message? If we are to fight the onslaught of money and disinformation from GOP billionaires, we need funds.  And we need lots of volunteers to talk to their neighbors about our core Democratic values. When the curtain is pulled back from the GOP’s anti-people agenda and folks understand that the Democratic Party that has championed the legislation that has helped most Americans, Democrats win elections.

Two Tenth Dems interns welcomed the standing-room-only crowd, which flowed to the outdoors on what, fortunately, was a beautiful June afternoon.  Grayslake Democratic leader Lowell Jaffe then posed the question of the afternoon: “Why an office here in Grayslake?”

The proud answer is that Democrats have made inroads at every level of government in Lake County and there is now a growing constituency to serve. Stephen Ark talked about the progress Tenth Dems volunteers have made over the last several election cycles, and Tenth Dems University Dean Sharon Sanders previewed upcoming programs that would help folks understand the issues of the day and how progressives have the answers to those problems.

Next, Tenth Dems Founding Chair Lauren Beth Gash introduced State Senator Daniel Biss (who is running for Illinois Comptroller).  Biss addressed the domination by the top one percent of the post-Bush recession recovery.  Referencing the big money in politics intended to ensure that Congress protects the interests of the oligarchs, Biss pointed out that dollars don’t cast votes; people do. The 2016 election will be critical to preserving and extending the progressive agenda against those who would drag us back to the 1920s.

After his remarks, Biss introduced his former State Senate colleague, Illinois Treasurer Mike Frerichs, the afternoon’s keynote speaker.  The first Democrat in years  elected to state office from downstate (and by the slimmest of margins), Frerichs, too, spoke about the need to protect working people, the poor, seniors, and the middle class from the Republican agenda.

Former 10th District Congressman Brad Schneider and Highland Park Mayor Nancy Rotering, who will be facing one another in the 2016 primary as they vie for the Democratic nomination for the 10th District’s Congressional seat, also attended the event.

Other elected officials and candidates present at the grand opening included State Senator Melinda Bush, State Representatives Sam Yingling and Elaine Nekritz, Lake County Board members Diane Hewitt and Terry Wilke, Avon Township Clerk Jeanne Kearby, Grayslake High School Board Member Hal Sloan, Wildwood Park District Commissioner Jim Neel, and Associate Judge Mitch Hoffman, who is a candidate for Circuit Court Judge.